Substantive Law Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Substantive Law - Movie Review ExampleThis paper intends to lose it from the substantive law point of view of the unfolding events within the movie The Accused as written by Tom Topper in 1988 (Ebert parity bit 1-10). The movie is a description of unfortunate happenings that involve Sarah Tobias who is the accused of luring herself into the unfortunate bodge ordeal and who is accused of the same. Moreover, in a rather twisty way, the representative moves from her accusation and she becomes the accuser in trying to seek justice for her own misfortune. The movie then depicts that rape victims would stand to be accused in causing it to happen. The drunkards in the omit where she goes and drinks uncontrollably, shows the substantive positionings of the legal movie by dint of the abuse of Tobias rights. The drunkard men blamed the accused for first over-drunkard-ness after which she engaged in charged trip the light fantastic, which leads to her rape. Under the substantive law p rovisions, the public (represented by the people who were drinking within the bar at the time of the happening) had the right to disciplined dance by the accused, which was not observed when the accused engaged in dancing provocatively. On the other hand, the accused had the right to personal security as against the assault with with(predicate) rape and jeering by the drunkards in the bar. ... Moreover, while drunk, the accused disrupts the peace of the customers who were enjoying themselves in the bar through indecent dances, which provoked the men to rape her. This was therefore offensive and the accused would be rightfully accused under the criminal law of engaging in risky behavior in the public. On her side as the defendant, Sarah would argue that she was entitled to taking alcohol in the bar just as any other adult person was. She would justify her dance with the fact that though she was drunk, she was allowed by the law to dance and as such(prenominal), she was not responsi ble for any possible offence she would cause the other people through her dance. She was therefore not rightfully being accused for being the cause to her rape but rather, the rapists should have been accused for physically assaulting her and emotionally hurting her through the chanting and the jeers, which encouraged her perpetrators to continue with harassing her. On the other side of the case was the accused accusing the rapists of causing physical and emotional harm to her through the rape as well as the jeers and the chants. With the plaintiff deciding to lower the charges against the accused in the cases for aggravated assault, the complainant feels rather assaulted in that the case involved had the magnitude of brutal rape in front of other people. The court under the substantive law framework had the responsibility to treat the case with the seriousness of such a crime against the complainants rights and freedoms. The complainants argument was therefore that though she as a woman who acted indecently in the bar had the right to say no to the atrocities and be heard which was not