Boston Massacre Essay -- essays research papers

The capital of Massachusetts Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. The fatal incident happened on serve 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British serviceman in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep revisal, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawlight-emitting diode in streets and fought in bars. &8220The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores (Mahin 1). A insubordinate anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople. at that place are three major things that led to the Boston Massacre First was the growing mistrust among the British soldiers and Americans. in that respect were a number of other incidents were the British clashed with the patriots and their supporters. Individual soldiers were beaten on street corners and s oldiers abused unarmed civilians. In all the Americans in Boston made it clear that the British soldiers were unwanted.The second reason is somewhat odd. The removal of two out of four regiments meant there were to inadequate amounts of soldiers to keep the peace. There were enough on the other hand to remind the patriots of the great British military.The last reason would be the revolt of the Townshend Acts. The patriots and Americans did not agree and discord with the British soldiers over it. The Act built tension between the two. (Griswold 23)On March 5, 1770 the dreadful day came. A mob of people went in front of the Customs Office in Boston Massachusetts and started to induce stuff and give insults at the soldiers. As a result to this questionable harassment the soldiers fired on the crowd. The first to die was a drab man named Crispus Attucks. He was a native of Frainghan, Massachusetts. He escaped from bondage in 1750 and had become a skimmer. Crispus Attucks is consid ered the first martyr of the American independency (Mahin 1). The four others who died were Samuel gray, a rope maker James Caldwell, a sailor Samuel Maverick, a seventeen year old apprentice and Patrick Carr, a lather worker and Irish immigrant. All in which were unarmed and viciously murdered. The soldiers killed three, mortally wounded two others, and wounded six. How much ha... ...at were stationed in Boston were finable for many other crimes. I think either the soldiers should start been bloodguilty for firing without an fix or that Preston should have been guilty for giving the nine to fire. According to Liesenfelt, the eight men tell they were adjacent Preston orders and should be move at one time (1). So the soldiers are saying they were following orders which means Preston is guilty. Also three black witnesses gave testimony that they did hear an order to fire by Preston. Then again a merchant said he did not hear an order. Either way the soldiers and/or Preston s hould have been guilty. I think it a lot easier to miss something said than to be hearing things. So the evidence is there that Preston gave an order to fire. I incur the verdict of the trial of the Boston Massacre should have been &8220guilty. The victims were unarmed and brutally murdered. I soldier enraged the citizens and were guilty of many other crimes. The order to fire give from Preston proves he&8217s guilty of the crime of manslaughter. My end is that the soldiers and/or Preston are guilty. &8220Half a pale of blood had been spilled into he snow (Mahin 2).